Jacques Rancière

17 December, 2014 - 20:00
Aleppo, Brussel
talk

!!!!! We are sorry to inform you that Jacques Rancière will not be able to come to Brussels next week, due to personal reasons. Both the DISSENT! session at Aleppo (17.12) and his intervention at Phd in One Night (16.12) are postponed.

“There is no politics of cinema, there are only singular figures according to which filmmakers apply themselves to bring together the two meanings of the word ‘politics’, through which we can consider a fiction in general and a cinematographic fiction in particular: politics as what a film speaks about and politics as the strategy of an artistic approach (…) We could say: the relation between a matter of justice and a practice of justness.”  (Jacques Rancière)

In samenwerking met ‘Phd in one night‘ project & Académie royale des beaux-arts de Bruxelles - École supérieure des arts (ARBA-ESA) & Aleppo.

Het bezoek van Jacques Rancière is mogelijk gemaakt door de steun van Kunstenplatform, Universitaire Associatie Brussel (VUB/EhB).

 

DISSENT! is een initiatief van Argos, Auguste Orts en Courtisane, in de context van het research project “Figures of Dissent” (KASK/Hogent), met de steun van VG.

 

Op 16 december spreekt Jacques Rancière ook op een Post-conference in het kader van het “Phd in one night” project aan Arba-Esa, D.A.M. Gallerie (reserved for students of ISAC / ARBA-ESA).

 

Gesprek met Jacques Rancière

How to think about the ways cinema can put into action the relation between the certainties of injustice, the uncertainties of justice and the calculation of justness? This question has been stirring Jacques Rancière ever since he was taken in by the wave of cinephilia that churned through Paris in the 1960’s. From his first interview in Cahiers du Cinéma in 1976, via his own series of writings for the same magazine between 1998 and 2001, to the publication of La Fable cinématographique (2001) and Les écarts du cinéma (2011), cinema has been an important strain throughout his work, linking his dwellings on the shores of politics with his ventures into the realms of aesthetics. How can cinema be thought of as an overpass between these two ever shifting landscapes, as a terrain of struggle that bears the original responsibility of politics: the organization of dissent? If it’s true that we can no longer believe in the dreams of cinema as the privileged form of the identification of art and life, or as an enigmatic force that can give us new vision and awaken us to a new consciousness, how can cinema still make a difference? According to Rancière, we need to let go of those persistent expectations that consider cinema as a instrument to inform political strategies and mobilize militant energies. Instead, it has to be regarded as nothing but a surface where experiences can be organized in new figures and relegated into new trajectories, as a “distribution of the sensible” that can evoke a process of transformation, disrupting the dominant logic of representation and changing the coordinates of the given. Any political “efficiency” of cinema cannot be based on a link between cause and effect, or a bond between revelation and mobilization – on the contrary, it has to content itself with a loss of destination, inviting us to reframe the cartography of the perceptible, the thinkable and the feasible. The question that remains is then not what cinema can do for us, but what we can do with cinema… In this DISSENT! session we will take a selection of recent films as starting point for a discussion on how cinema and its culture can contribute to a reinvention of politics.